<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Google Climbs to New Heights of Arrogance With Wave</title>
	<atom:link href="http://digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/2009/05/29/google-climbs-to-new-heights-of-arrogance-with-wave/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/2009/05/29/google-climbs-to-new-heights-of-arrogance-with-wave/</link>
	<description>all things, DAM, MAM, MedAM, VAM, PAM etc</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 30 Mar 2011 22:49:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.1.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rick</title>
		<link>http://digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/2009/05/29/google-climbs-to-new-heights-of-arrogance-with-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>Rick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 01 Jun 2009 22:39:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/?p=2676#comment-279</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s important to remember this was launched at a developer event, and the speakers emphasized that it was an unfinished product. At face value, Wave seems to have a lot of potential--A LOT--but it is fair to question whether this is going to end up as a real product, or whether Google is just trying to crowdsource development resources for their latest experiment. Google does have a reputation for bait-and-switch tactics when it comes to recruiting.

SOMEONE needs to fix email, that&#039;s for sure. Wave is what Unified Communications should have been. Hopefully someone will write a Skype plug-in for Wave!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#039;s important to remember this was launched at a developer event, and the speakers emphasized that it was an unfinished product. At face value, Wave seems to have a lot of potential&#8211;A LOT&#8211;but it is fair to question whether this is going to end up as a real product, or whether Google is just trying to crowdsource development resources for their latest experiment. Google does have a reputation for bait-and-switch tactics when it comes to recruiting.</p>
<p>SOMEONE needs to fix email, that&#039;s for sure. Wave is what Unified Communications should have been. Hopefully someone will write a Skype plug-in for Wave!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: giles Palmer</title>
		<link>http://digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/2009/05/29/google-climbs-to-new-heights-of-arrogance-with-wave/comment-page-1/#comment-278</link>
		<dc:creator>giles Palmer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2009 10:23:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.digitalassetmanagement.org.uk/?p=2676#comment-278</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t agree with this analysis. There are plenty of google projects which haven&#039;t been abandoned and it&#039;s this spirit of invention which marks google out from its peers. As for the sales and marketing stuff - so what? plus the web has done a pretty good job of marketing google products without any involvement - google search did no marketing at all for the first 3 year or so</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#039;t agree with this analysis. There are plenty of google projects which haven&#039;t been abandoned and it&#039;s this spirit of invention which marks google out from its peers. As for the sales and marketing stuff &#8211; so what? plus the web has done a pretty good job of marketing google products without any involvement &#8211; google search did no marketing at all for the first 3 year or so</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

